Keyword summary
81% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,037 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maggie Haberman results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 3,017 hits . Analysis detected 16,211 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,128 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (19,903 of 37,533 keywords). This Maggie Haberman is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group. Maggie Haberman
Keyword details
Total words: 13,128
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 23.0% 23.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst