Keyword summary
27% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lionel Scaloni results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 1,207 hits . Analysis detected 5,785 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,372 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (31,665 of 37,536 keywords). This Lionel Scaloni is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group. Lionel Scaloni
Keyword details
Total words: 7,372
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 16.4% 16.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst