Keyword summary
44% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsay Clancy results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 2,081 hits . Analysis detected 14,722 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,879 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (31,929 of 37,536 keywords). This Lindsay Clancy is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group. Lindsay Clancy
Keyword details
Total words: 19,879
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles19.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.0% 0.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst