Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leimert Park results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 766 hits. Analysis detected 6,485 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,989 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (29,072 of 35,181 keywords). This Leimert Park is better (less manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group.
Leimert Park
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
18%Leimert Park (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

17% percentile
025507510017.4% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate