Keyword summary
⁠61%2 analyzed articles/videos1,071 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Boebert results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.5% saturation with 1,174 hits. Analysis detected 5,617 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,977 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (7,930 of 34,832 keywords). This Lauren Boebert is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Lauren Boebert
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠78%Lauren Boebert (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,977
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

77% percentile
025507510077.2% percentile
4.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 29.5%29.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.4%6.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 29.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos