Keyword summary
72%4 analyzed articles/videos3,287 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lake Mead results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 1,022 hits. Analysis detected 8,372 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,642 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (30,993 of 36,715 keywords). This Lake Mead is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
Lake Mead
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
16%Lake Mead (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,642
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

16% percentile
025507510015.6% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate