Keyword summary
⁠88%2 analyzed articles/videos3,483 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labor Force results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 1,724 hits. Analysis detected 12,718 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,504 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (21,599 of 37,533 keywords). This Labor Force is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Labor Force
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠43%Labor Force (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,504
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

43% percentile
025507510042.5% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.2%15.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 16.4%16.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 12.6%12.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos