Keyword summary
15%2 analyzed articles/videos719 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Krasnodar results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 396 hits. Analysis detected 2,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,481 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (16,300 of 35,864 keywords). This Krasnodar is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Krasnodar
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
55%Krasnodar (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,481
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

55% percentile
025507510054.6% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos