Keyword summary
65% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kirsten Gillibrand results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 993 hits . Analysis detected 10,307 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,049 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (26,007 of 37,530 keywords). This Kirsten Gillibrand is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group. Kirsten Gillibrand
Keyword details
Total words: 10,049
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst