Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,972 analyzed words
BS Summary: These King Charles results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 1,246 hits . Analysis detected 11,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,546 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (16,980 of 36,204 keywords). This King Charles is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group. King Charles
Keyword details
Total words: 8,546
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.1% percentile 3.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 13.8% 13.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 0.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst