Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos6,088 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ken Burns results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 3,567 hits. Analysis detected 25,214 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,352 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,761 of 37,536 keywords). This Ken Burns is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group.
Ken Burns
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
32%Ken Burns (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 24,352
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

31% percentile
025507510031.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles24.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 14.7%14.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos