Keyword summary
96%1 analyzed article/video648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Pearson results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41.9% saturation with 1,086 hits. Analysis detected 4,604 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 91% (5,658 of 58,096 keywords). This Justin Pearson is worse (more manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group.
Justin Pearson
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
91%Justin Pearson (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,592
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

90% percentile
025507510090.3% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 41.9%41.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 24.5%24.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 18.6%18.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 12.0%12.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 41.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 24.5%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate