Keyword summary
70% 2 analyzed articles/videos 975 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julio Cesar Sosa Celis results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 855 hits . Analysis detected 4,795 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,431 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 86% (5,442 of 37,536 keywords). This Julio Cesar Sosa Celis is worse (more manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group. Julio Cesar Sosa Celis
Keyword details
Total words: 3,431
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.5% percentile 5.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.7% 16.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 24.9% 24.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 21.7% 21.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 21.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Red Herring: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst