Keyword summary
16% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,099 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jon Stewart results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 1,113 hits . Analysis detected 6,299 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,868 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (28,238 of 35,718 keywords). This Jon Stewart is better (less manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group. Jon Stewart
Keyword details
Total words: 7,868
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst