Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,571 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Jefferson results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 716 hits . Analysis detected 3,952 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,832 of 6,628 authors). This Thomas Jefferson is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group. Thomas Jefferson
Author details
Total words: 6,284
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.4% 9.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst