Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 353 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John-Brennan results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Quote-first Misdirection , and Begging the Question , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 242 hits . Analysis detected 1,155 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,412 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,640 of 37,536 keywords). This John-Brennan is worse (more manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group. John-Brennan
Keyword details
Total words: 1,412
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.7% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.1% 17.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.6% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst