Keyword summary
88% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,556 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joan Sebastian Guerrero results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 3,909 hits . Analysis detected 34,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,383 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (17,767 of 37,536 keywords). This Joan Sebastian Guerrero is worse (more manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group. Joan Sebastian Guerrero
Keyword details
Total words: 22,383
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles22.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.6% 16.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst