Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jared Isaacman results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 1,028 hits . Analysis detected 7,577 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,493 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 66% (13,058 of 37,536 keywords). This Jared Isaacman is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group. Jared Isaacman
Keyword details
Total words: 5,493
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.2% percentile 3.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.8% 13.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 18.7% 18.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst