Keyword summary
71% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,152 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Fishback results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 1,270 hits . Analysis detected 9,069 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,529 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (24,366 of 37,536 keywords). This James Fishback is better (less manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group. James Fishback
Keyword details
Total words: 8,529
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst