Author summary
82%2 analyzed articles/videos572 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Murray results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38.6% saturation with 1,682 hits. Analysis detected 11,860 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,361 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 86% (927 of 6,628 authors). This Olivia Murray is worse (more manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group.
Olivia Murray
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
86%Olivia Murray (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,361
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510086.0% percentile
5.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 38.6%38.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 28.8%28.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.7%12.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 20.4%20.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 11.5%11.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 13.6%13.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.1%7.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 7.1%7.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 38.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 28.8%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 12.7%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 20.4%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Author 19.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.9%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Author 13.6%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 11.5%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Author 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.4%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate