Keyword summary
21% 2 analyzed articles/videos 642 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Beard Awards results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , In-Group Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 416 hits . Analysis detected 2,864 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,354 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,180 of 37,536 keywords). This James Beard Awards is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group. James Beard Awards
Keyword details
Total words: 3,354
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.9% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst