Keyword summary
21%2 analyzed articles/videos642 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Beard Awards results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 416 hits. Analysis detected 2,864 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,354 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,180 of 37,536 keywords). This James Beard Awards is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
James Beard Awards
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
57%James Beard Awards (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,354
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510056.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos