Keyword summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos2,299 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel And Hezbollah results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 1,319 hits. Analysis detected 12,703 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,624 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (31,498 of 34,791 keywords). This Israel And Hezbollah is better (less manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group.
Israel And Hezbollah
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
10%Israel And Hezbollah (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

10% percentile
02550751009.5% percentile
1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles18.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate