Keyword summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Us War Ceasefire Negotiations Strait results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 1,308 hits. Analysis detected 5,471 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,272 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (30,452 of 37,536 keywords). This Iran Us War Ceasefire Negotiations Strait is better (less manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group.
Iran Us War Ceasefire Negotiations Strait

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

19% percentile
025507510018.9% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.1%14.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos