Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,025 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Nuclear Program results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 1,288 hits . Analysis detected 7,072 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,218 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (22,453 of 34,832 keywords). This Iran Nuclear Program is better (less manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group. Iran Nuclear Program
Keyword details
Total words: 7,218
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.8% 17.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% No True Scotsman: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst