Keyword summary
81% 2 analyzed articles/videos 336 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Investing results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 477 hits . Analysis detected 3,428 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,852 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (16,073 of 37,536 keywords). This Investing is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group. Investing
Keyword details
Total words: 3,852
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.2% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst