Keyword summary
⁠69%3 analyzed articles/videos892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inverse Recommends Movies results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 777 hits. Analysis detected 5,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,156 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (22,880 of 37,530 keywords). This Inverse Recommends Movies is better (less manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group.
Inverse Recommends Movies
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠39%Inverse Recommends Movies (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,156
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

39% percentile
025507510039.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.6%12.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate