Keyword summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video154 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indianapolis Public Library results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 90 faulty-reasoning hits from 462 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (11,525 of 37,536 keywords). This Indianapolis Public Library is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Indianapolis Public Library
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 462
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

69% percentile
025507510069.3% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles462 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos