Keyword summary
27%1 analyzed article/video294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Incentive Program results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 433 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 87% (6,765 of 52,155 keywords). This Incentive Program is worse (more manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Incentive Program
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
87%Incentive Program (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,176
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

87% percentile
025507510087.0% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos