Keyword summary
22%6 analyzed articles/videos8,561 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immigration Court results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 2,697 hits. Analysis detected 20,877 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,686 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (33,987 of 35,649 keywords). This Immigration Court is better (less manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group.
Immigration Court
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
5%Immigration Court (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 33,686
Article count: 6
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

5% percentile
02550751004.7% percentile
1.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles33.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate