Keyword summary
⁠25%2 analyzed articles/videos389 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Illinois Department Of Public Health results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Recency Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 304 hits. Analysis detected 2,933 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,716 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (25,885 of 37,536 keywords). This Illinois Department Of Public Health is better (less manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group.
Illinois Department Of Public Health
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,716
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

31% percentile
025507510031.0% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos