Keyword summary
⁠95%5 analyzed articles/videos2,499 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hypocrisy results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.7% saturation with 4,193 hits. Analysis detected 26,062 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,816 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (10,786 of 36,389 keywords). This Hypocrisy is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Hypocrisy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠71%Hypocrisy (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

70% percentile
025507510070.4% percentile
4.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 32.7%32.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 18.9%18.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 15.8%15.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 17.4%17.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 32.7%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.9%Tu Quoque: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 0.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos