Keyword summary
86% 4 analyzed articles/videos 5,021 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hunger results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 3,111 hits . Analysis detected 29,305 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,772 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,907 of 37,536 keywords). This Hunger is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group. Hunger
Keyword details
Total words: 22,772
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles22.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst