Keyword summary
76%6 analyzed articles/videos3,321 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Rights Watch results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 2,771 hits. Analysis detected 20,203 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,496 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (18,102 of 34,426 keywords). This Human Rights Watch is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Human Rights Watch
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
48%Human Rights Watch (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

47% percentile
025507510047.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles16.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.7%16.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.9%3.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate