AP News53%

US has deported thousands of Cubans and Venezuelans to danger in Mexico, Human Rights Watch says 51%

By ANNA-CATHERINE BRIGIDA6%

5/27/2026, 6:08:56 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 155 hits. Analysis detected 881 faulty-reasoning hits from 609 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.4% and a BS Rank of 51% (10,929 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 50.10% of the article peer group.

MEXICO CITY (AP)  The Trump administration has deported nearly 13,000 Cubans, Venezuelans and other nationals to Mexico, where they are vulnerable to cartel violence in an unfamiliar country, a report by Human Rights Watch released Wednesday said. 
While Mexico has accepted these types of deportations for years, the deportees under the Trump administration are older and have lived in the U.S. for longer than in the past, making it more difficult for them to find work and increasing the urgency of the need for medical care. 
The report, which is based on more than 50 interviews in the southern Mexican cities Tapachula and Villahermosa, comes as U.S. 
President Donald Trump has expanded immigration enforcement to carry out his mass deportation plan. 
This has meant that immigrants who were not previously targeted, such as Cubans with years or decades living in the U.S., have been caught up in the immigration dragnet. 
Some countries, such as Cuba and Venezuela, limit deportation flights or don’t accept deportees at all, so they are instead sent to Mexico or other countries with which the U.S. has struck deals. 
“That’s the reality for many Cubans deported to Mexico,” Hava said. 
“Imagine being 60 or 70 years old, uprooted from your life overnight and sent to a country you don’t know, where authorities leave you out to dry without access to even the most basic services  shelter, healthcare. 
Imagine being dropped in dangerous cities with nothing but the clothes on your back,” said Alcira Hava, Leonard H. 
Sandler Fellow at Human Rights Watch, who worked on the report. 
Cubans represent the largest group sent to Mexico, according to the report, with more than 4,300 deported. 
More than half the 41 Cubans interviewed had lived in the U.S. since the 1980s or 1990s, arriving during the Mariel boatlift or lottery program in the 1990s. 
Most had a green card but had lost it. 
More than half the Cubans deported had a criminal record, but only 16% were for violent crimes, according to the researchers. 
One-fourth had no criminal history. 
Most were detained at routine check-ins with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, but some were detained at their workplace or in public spaces. 
None were taken before a judge to contest their deportation to Mexico, even when they expressed fear for their safety. 
The Cuban diaspora, with access to a fast-tracked pathway to residency and citizenship through the Cuban Adjustment Act, has been shocked by the extent of Trump’s immigration crackdown. 
Once in Mexico, these deportees are sent to southern cities with few job opportunities, limited access to medical care and where cartels prey on them. 
They face a complicated logistical process to receive refugee status in Mexico, if they even qualify. 
A shelter in Villahermosa has received Cuban deportees as old as 83 in the past year, a departure from the young men and families it usually receives, according to shelter worker Josué Leal. 
“The U.S. discards them. 
Cuba discards them,” Leal said, calling it a form of “double punishment.” 
How the third country deportations are being carried out is unclear, since neither the U.S. or Mexico has made the agreement public. 
HRW called for both countries to publish the agreement and to ensure that due process and international law is respected in these cases. 
It called on Mexico to ensure access to medical treatment and a pathway to legalize immigration status for those who can’t return to their home countries. 
It called on the U.S. to suspend these deportations, barring these guarantees. 
Follow AP’s Latin America coverage at https://apnews.com/hub/latin-america 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 1.4%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.8%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 2.6%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic1.8%This article: 2.8%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.3%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic2.8%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.3%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.3%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 4.8%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect6.9%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.6%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.6%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.3%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.3%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 1.6%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 1.1%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias13.0%This article: 22.2%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 5.1%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias22.2%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.3%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.8%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.1%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.3%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.4%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.8%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias5.4%This article: 4.6%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.4%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect4.6%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.6%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.8%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 2.2%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority1.8%This article: 2.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.4%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma2.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 1.9%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization10.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 25.5%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 2.7%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion25.5%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.1%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 8.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 1.5%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.3%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.2%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof3.3%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 1.8%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 1.3%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal1.8%This article: 2.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman2.0%This article: 6.1%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.7%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.1%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.8%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.8%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote1.8%This article: 0.7%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.1%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.7%This article: 6.9%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.7%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice6.9%This article: 6.2%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.6%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination6.2%This article: 0.0%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 1.8%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.3%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias6.2%This article: 1.1%Anna-Catherine Brigida: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.1%

609 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers34%attributed speech404writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Human Rights Watch • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageHava • 11 words • 100.0% coverageHava • 38 words • 100.0% coverageAlcira Hava • 19 words • 0.0% coverageHuman Rights Watch • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJosué Leal • 33 words • 0.0% coverageJosué Leal • 4 words • 100.0% coverageJosué Leal • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageHRW • 23 words • 0.0% coverageHRW • 26 words • 0.0% coverageHRW • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Hava

100%flagged-word coverage
49 attributed words24% of attributed speech72% writer coverage
0%40.0%80.0%Indoctrination+77.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Hava: 77.6%77.6%Unattributed Quote+22.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Hava: 22.4%22.4%Biased Writer Voice-10.4 ptsWriter: 10.4%Hava: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -9.4 ptsWriter: 9.4%Hava: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.7 ptsWriter: 1.7%Hava: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.