Keyword summary
7% 6 analyzed articles/videos 9,989 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houston Chronicle results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 2,657 hits . Analysis detected 13,888 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,854 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (35,039 of 35,214 keywords). This Houston Chronicle is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group. Houston Chronicle
Keyword details
Total words: 34,854
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.5% percentile 0.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles34.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst