Keyword summary
25% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Homepage Regional China results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 2,566 hits . Analysis detected 18,903 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,199 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (35,432 of 37,530 keywords). This Homepage Regional China is better (less manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group. Homepage Regional China
Keyword details
Total words: 26,199
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.6% percentile 1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles26.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst