Keyword summary
21% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,962 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hollywood Hills results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 419 hits . Analysis detected 3,582 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,089 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,030 of 37,536 keywords). This Hollywood Hills is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group. Hollywood Hills
Keyword details
Total words: 6,089
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.0% 0.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst