LAPD arrests singer ‘D4vd’ on suspicion of murder in death of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez 0%

By Brooke Mallory0%

4/17/2026, 4:27:27 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 342 faulty-reasoning hits from 560 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,204 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

The Los Angeles Police Department arrested 21-year-old David Anthony Burke, the alt-pop singer known professionally in the music world as “D4vd,” on Thursday, on suspicion of murder in the death of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez. 
Burke is being held without bail. 
The arrest comes approximately seven months after the teenager’s severely decomposed and dismembered remains were discovered on September 8, 2025, in the front trunk of a Tesla Model Y registered to Burke. 
The vehicle had been abandoned and towed from the Hollywood Hills area of Los Angeles. 
The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Major Crimes Division is scheduled to review the case for formal charging decisions, with a presentation expected on this upcoming Monday. 
No formal charges or indictment have been filed as of yet. 
Celeste Rivas Hernandez, from Lake Elsinore, California, had a history of running away from home. 
However, she was last reported missing in April 2024 at age 13 and had limited contact with her family afterward. 
The exact date and cause of her death have not been publicly determined due to the advanced state of decomposition. 
Investigators believe Hernandez was killed sometime after she turned 14. 
The nature of her relationship with Burke has been a significant focus of the investigation. 
While authorities have not yet officially described it as “romantic,” family members have stated that Celeste referred to having a boyfriend named David, and other reported evidence  including social media activity, tattoos, and witness accounts  suggests they had a very close personal relationship. 
Nonetheless, Burke’s defense team maintains his complete innocence and disputes any implication of responsibility for her death. 
Her remains were identified by the Los Angeles County Medical Examiner. 
Burke was taken into custody shortly after 4:30 p.m. at a residence in the Hollywood Hills without incident. 
LAPD Robbery-Homicide Division detectives, with assistance from other units, executed the arrest. 
One video from the scene showed officers using a battering ram on a gate. 
He was booked into custody later that evening. 
The property where he was arrested is a modern, high-end rental home in the Hollywood Hills area. 
Earlier in the investigation, in September 2025, LAPD detectives executed a search warrant at a nearby residence on Doheny Place, seizing computers and other items. 
Burke’s defense attorneys  Blair Berk, Marilyn Bednarski, and Regina Peter  issued a statement asserting his innocence. 
“Let us be clear  the actual evidence in this case will show that David Burke did not murder Celeste Rivas Hernandez and he was not the cause of her death,” the singer’s lawyers announced. 
“There has been no indictment returned by any grand jury in this case and no criminal complaint filed. 
David has only been detained under suspicion. 
We will vigorously defend David’s innocence.” 
The case has drawn significant public and media attention due to Burke’s rising profile in the music industry, known for songs such as “Romantic Homicide.” 
A secret grand jury investigation had been underway, with details emerging earlier this year related to family objections to subpoenas in Texas. 
As the investigation continues, Burke is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. 
The District Attorney’s office has not yet announced formal charges. 
Stay informed! 
Receive breaking news alerts directly to your inbox for free. 
Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.0%Brooke Mallory: 5.2%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias8.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 1.4%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Brooke Mallory: 3.2%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic10.2%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 1.8%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Brooke Mallory: 17.5%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.9%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 3.8%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.4%Brooke Mallory: 12.9%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias8.4%This article: 10.4%Brooke Mallory: 2.0%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias10.4%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 3.9%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 2.1%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 3.8%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 4.5%Brooke Mallory: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect4.5%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 1.0%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Brooke Mallory: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 2.3%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 5.4%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 1.9%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 5.7%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.7%Brooke Mallory: 8.6%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion5.7%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 2.2%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.2%Brooke Mallory: 2.8%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote3.2%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 1.4%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 11.1%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 2.7%Brooke Mallory: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination2.7%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brooke Mallory: 6.8%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Brooke Mallory: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.7%

560 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker12%attributed speech494writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageBlair Berk, Marilyn Bednarski, and Regina Peter • 35 words • 0.0% coverageBlair Berk, Marilyn Bednarski, and Regina Peter • 18 words • 100.0% coverageBlair Berk, Marilyn Bednarski, and Regina Peter • 7 words • 0.0% coverageBlair Berk, Marilyn Bednarski, and Regina Peter • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
89%flagged-word coverage
66 attributed words100% of attributed speech30% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Unattributed Quote+27.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Blair Berk, Marilyn Bednarski, and Regina Peter: 27.3%27.3%Indoctrination-3.0 ptsWriter: 3.0%Blair Berk, Marilyn Bednarski, and Regina Peter: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.0 ptsWriter: 3.0%Blair Berk, Marilyn Bednarski, and Regina Peter: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.