Keyword summary
40% 12 analyzed articles/videos 7,844 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celeste Rivas Hernandez results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 4,595 hits . Analysis detected 23,016 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,937 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,283 of 37,536 keywords). This Celeste Rivas Hernandez is better (less manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group. Celeste Rivas Hernandez
Keyword details
Total words: 34,937
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score12 analyzed articles34.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst