Keyword summary
52% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Anthony Burke results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 2,318 hits . Analysis detected 11,820 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,490 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,932 of 37,536 keywords). This David Anthony Burke is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. David Anthony Burke
Keyword details
Total words: 14,490
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles14.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst