Keyword summary
63% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Highland Park results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 820 hits . Analysis detected 6,435 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,894 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,493 of 37,049 keywords). This Highland Park is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. Highland Park
Keyword details
Total words: 6,894
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Special Pleading: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst