Detroit Evening Report: City council approves adding places of worship to list of locations free from alcohol, drug ads 3%

By Bre'Anna Tinsley4%

7/16/2026, 8:47:36 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Circular Reasoning, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 344 faulty-reasoning hits from 591 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 15.6% and a BS Rank of 3% (21,262 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 97.10% of the article peer group.

Detroit City Council approved a change to an ordinance that prohibits alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana advertisements to be placed withing 1000 feet of sensitive locations. 
Places of worship have been added to the list of protected locations. 
Council President Pro-Tem Coleman Young raised concerns about information on treatment centers and educational services being affected by this new rule. 
But Councilmember Scott Benson says that is not the case. 
“This ordinance does not capture that. 
And this ordinance is already in place for alcohol and tobacco products, and there is no prohibition about advertising [Detroit Integrated Health Network] services or other services for substance use disorders.” 
The amended ordinance passed unanimously . 
Additional headlines for Thursday, July 16, 2026 
Highland Park launches scholarship program 
The Highland Park School District announced a new scholarship program to help residents pursue post-secondary education. 
Officials says Highland Park high schoolers are often not eligible for promise scholarships in the school districts they attended because of their address. 
The Highland Park Promise Scholarship is available to every graduating high school senior who lives in the city. 
Beginning fall 2027, eligible student can get an initial $1,000 to go toward any post-secondary education such as community colleges, universities, or trade schools. 
Because the school district does not currently have its own high school, the scholarship will be available to any student attending high school in a neighboring district as long as they currently live in Highland Park. 
Congress candidate forum 
The Eastside Community Network is hosting a forum with the 2026 U.S. 
House and Senate Candidates about issues shaping Detroit’s eastside. 
Candidates expected to participate include Donavan McKinney for the U.S. 
Houses 13th district, Abraham Aiyash for the State Senate first district, as well as candidates for the 3rd Senate District and 9th and 11th State Representative Districts. 
Forums will begin at 9:30 a.m. on Saturday July 18 at the East Side Community Network on 4401 Conner Street. 
WHEN: Saturday, July 18, 2026. 
Doors open at 9:30 a.m. 
 10:15  10:45 a.m.  U.S. 
House, District 13 
 10:45  11:15 a.m.  State Senate, District 1 
 11:15 a.m.  12:45 p.m.  State Senate, District 3 
 12:45  1:30 p.m.  Lunch 
 1:30  2:45 p.m.— State House, District 9 
 2:45  3:30 p.m.  State House, District 11 
WHERE: Eastside Community Network (ECN), 4401 Conner St, Detroit, MI 48215 
Move over law 
Michigan State Police is planning a one-day initiative to enforce the state’s “move over” law. 
When approaching a stationary vehicle with flashing lights such as police, ambulances, fire, rescue or road service vehicles, drivers must slow down to at least 10 miles per hour below the posted speed limit and move over one lane. 
If you cannot move over due to traffic, weather or road conditions, still slow down and pass with caution. 
Colonel James Grady said in a statement there have been 13 instances this year where patrol vehicles were struck while conducting traffic stops. 
The one day initiative will be on July 20 from 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. across Michigan and neighboring states. 
Listen to the latest episode of the “Detroit Evening Report” on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, NPR.org or wherever you get your podcasts. 
Support the podcasts you love. 
One-of-a-kind podcasts from WDET bring you engaging conversations, news you need to know and stories you love to hear. 
Keep the conversations coming. 
Please make a gift today. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 1.3%WDET: 1.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 2.0%WDET: 2.3%Availability Heuristic3.9%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 1.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 2.0%WDET: 4.7%Framing Effect1.5%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.1%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 1.5%WDET: 3.5%Optimism Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 1.5%WDET: 3.4%Negativity Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 1.0%WDET: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 2.0%WDET: 5.6%Halo Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.7%WDET: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.2%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 1.9%WDET: 3.3%Appeal to Authority5.2%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 6.1%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.8%WDET: 0.1%Circular Reasoning6.1%This article: 3.9%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 2.5%WDET: 3.4%Hasty Generalization3.9%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.1%WDET: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.2%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 1.8%WDET: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion3.2%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.3%WDET: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.3%WDET: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.9%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 3.7%WDET: 1.8%Anecdotal3.9%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.2%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.7%WDET: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.2%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.6%WDET: 0.8%Unattributed Quote1.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 1.3%WDET: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.9%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 2.3%WDET: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice3.9%This article: 0.7%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 1.1%WDET: 2.6%Indoctrination0.7%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Bre'Anna Tinsley: 7.9%WDET: 7.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…8.5%

591 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers35%attributed speech387writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageColeman Young • 21 words • 0.0% coverageScott Benson • 10 words • 0.0% coverageScott Benson • 6 words • 100.0% coverageScott Benson • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageHighland Park School District • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageHighland Park School District • 18 words • 0.0% coverageHighland Park School District • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageEastside Community Network • 12 words • 0.0% coverageEastside Community Network • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageMichigan State Police • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJames Grady • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWDET • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

WDET

100%flagged-word coverage
19 attributed words9.3% of attributed speech24% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +92.0 ptsWriter: 8.0%WDET: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-5.9 ptsWriter: 5.9%WDET: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-1.0 ptsWriter: 1.0%WDET: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.