Keyword summary
6% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,086 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Detroit City Council results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 475 hits . Analysis detected 1,516 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,849 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (27,384 of 37,536 keywords). This Detroit City Council is better (less manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group. Detroit City Council
Keyword details
Total words: 3,849
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst