Keyword summary
5% 2 analyzed articles/videos 826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eastside Community Network results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 306 hits . Analysis detected 1,085 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,069 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,279 of 37,536 keywords). This Eastside Community Network is better (less manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group. Eastside Community Network
Keyword details
Total words: 3,069
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst