Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,894 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hawks results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Recency Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 2,425 hits . Analysis detected 14,887 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,169 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (22,050 of 35,427 keywords). This Hawks is better (less manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group. Hawks
Keyword details
Total words: 13,169
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.4% 18.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst