Keyword summary
59%7 analyzed articles/videos4,771 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harvard results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 4,074 hits. Analysis detected 27,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,262 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (21,415 of 37,536 keywords). This Harvard is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Harvard
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
43%Harvard (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

43% percentile
025507510042.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles20.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 20.1%20.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate