Keyword summary
59% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,771 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harvard results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 4,074 hits . Analysis detected 27,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,262 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (21,415 of 37,536 keywords). This Harvard is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group. Harvard
Keyword details
Total words: 20,262
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles20.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 20.1% 20.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst