Increasing Number Of Ivy League Students Can't Even Read 58%

By Skye Graham0%

7/10/2026, 11:33:26 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.1% saturation with 253 hits. Analysis detected 1,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 764 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.8% and a BS Rank of 58% (8,785 of 20,518 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the article peer group.

Image Credit Ron Lach / Pexels 
When a Harvard student needs ChatGPT to help with reading a novel, it’s clear that America’s high schools aren’t teaching students how to read. 
A new story from The Atlantic shows the decline in literacy by telling the story of a Harvard student having trouble in class. 
Assistant Director for Humanities and Social Sciences Support Margaret Rennix said this student came to her and told her about using AI to translate Anthony Burgess’s A Clockwork Orange into easier language. 
Rennix told The Atlantic that the student was confused by what the student called “Old English” in the 1962 novel. 
Unlike actual Old English texts like Beowulf , which some colleges still assign, A Clockwork Orange is written in English, as well as a fictional Russian-based slang called “Nadsat.” 
The Nadsat language is not impossible to read, however, as many internet sources contain dictionaries of the words used in the text. 
Rennix explained how some students view reading in the modern age: “By asking them to read, professors are arbitrarily withholding information from students by forcing them to get it through this more difficult medium,” she told The Atlantic. 
The Atlantic’s new cover story by @rosehorowitch is absolutely definitive on the end of the age of reading in America—and the emergence of a new post-literate age in modern life 
Some core facts and anecdotes: 
1. 
Reading is shrinking. 
The share of Americans who read for pleasure… 
- Derek Thompson (@DKThomp) July 8, 2026 
The literacy crisis has certainly made its way to universities, but it did not begin there. 
A survey by The New York Times found that high schoolers are reading very few full books every year  often only one or two. 
Rather than assigning full books, the survey found, teachers instead assign short excerpts from texts in the hopes that students will read them. 
In the digital era, educators are catering to students’ shortened attention spans. 
“The reader of an excerpt is utterly reliant on the skill of the one who chose the excerpt, to say nothing of the good faith required to represent the original author well,” Rachelle Peterson wrote for The Federalist in March. 
“And the reader of excerpts is in a position of dependence on some cultural elite who made the big decisions for him.” 
Aatif Rashid, teacher at UCLA’s Extension Writers Program, expressed a similar concern about excerpted texts in a post on X : “[T]he big thing that stood out to me as a teacher is how schools are actively making the reading crisis worse by reducing the number of books they assign in high school.” 
The literacy decline isn’t just anecdotal. 
In a 2025 Education Week survey , 58 percent of educators said “a quarter or more” of their students struggle with “basic reading skills.” 
Twenty-eight percent of the respondents said the main reason their students struggle is a lack of motivation to read, while 19 percent blamed a lack of fluency. 
This follows a concerning trend of declining literacy in America overall. 
The National Literacy Institute found that 21 percent of American adults are functionally illiterate in a 2024 study. 
Some states such as Texas are trying their hardest to push back against the declining literacy rates among America’s students. 
The Texas Board of Education recently approved new curriculum that includes a literary canon , universal across all public schools. 
All public school students in the state will be required to read texts like Hamlet by William Shakespeare, The Inferno by Dante Alighieri, and passages from the Bible. 
Transitioning back to full-length texts is the first of many steps public schools need to take to reverse this decline. 
Otherwise, we can expect a generation of Ivy League graduates who cannot read a high school-level novel. 
Skye Graham is an intern at The Federalist. 
She is a senior History major at Hillsdale College and serves as the assistant features editor for the Hillsdale Collegian. 
Shop The #FDRLSTSWAG Store 
Outrage Over Texas Teaching The Bible Is Anti-Intellectual 
America’s Anti-American Public Schools Are Destroying What The Declaration Gave Us 
One-Third Of Americans Can Barely Read, But They Can Still Vote 
Replacing Gay Race Communism With Bible Stories In School Is A Good Start To Saving The Country 
MIA Mitch McConnell Must Explain His Absence Or Retire 
Propaganda Press Buries Illegal Alien’s Alleged Attempt To Run Over ICE Agent Before Fatal Shooting 
5 Top Reasons The Smithsonian American History Museum Is A National Disgrace 
The Minimal Responsibilities And Unintended Consequences Of Medicaid Work Requirements 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.5%Skye Graham: 9.8%The Federalist: 8.5%Confirmation Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 1.1%The Federalist: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%Skye Graham: 3.7%The Federalist: 3.4%Availability Heuristic9.4%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.7%The Federalist: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Skye Graham: 3.6%The Federalist: 2.4%Overconfidence Bias3.9%This article: 5.0%Skye Graham: 6.1%The Federalist: 10.2%Framing Effect5.0%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 6.2%Skye Graham: 1.1%The Federalist: 0.6%Status Quo Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.5%Skye Graham: 0.7%The Federalist: 1.0%Optimism Bias5.5%This article: 5.5%Skye Graham: 2.5%The Federalist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias5.5%This article: 33.1%Skye Graham: 11.8%The Federalist: 12.2%Negativity Bias33.1%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Skye Graham: 1.0%The Federalist: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error3.0%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Skye Graham: 4.1%The Federalist: 4.0%In-Group Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.5%The Federalist: 2.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 1.1%The Federalist: 2.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.4%Skye Graham: 0.0%The Federalist: 1.2%Recency Bias0.4%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Skye Graham: 4.4%The Federalist: 5.2%Ad Hominem4.5%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.8%The Federalist: 2.8%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.2%Skye Graham: 4.3%The Federalist: 5.2%Appeal to Authority9.2%This article: 9.2%Skye Graham: 1.7%The Federalist: 2.8%False Dilemma9.2%This article: 2.2%Skye Graham: 1.4%The Federalist: 2.2%Slippery Slope2.2%This article: 3.0%Skye Graham: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.4%Circular Reasoning3.0%This article: 22.5%Skye Graham: 10.0%The Federalist: 11.4%Hasty Generalization22.5%This article: 0.7%Skye Graham: 0.8%The Federalist: 0.4%Red Herring0.7%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 19.1%Skye Graham: 7.2%The Federalist: 8.2%Appeal to Emotion19.1%This article: 10.5%Skye Graham: 2.4%The Federalist: 3.2%Begging the Question10.5%This article: 14.7%Skye Graham: 2.4%The Federalist: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.7%This article: 1.2%Skye Graham: 0.9%The Federalist: 0.5%Tu Quoque1.2%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.4%The Federalist: 1.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.2%Skye Graham: 5.9%The Federalist: 2.7%Anecdotal6.2%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.6%Skye Graham: 1.6%The Federalist: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.6%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 2.2%Skye Graham: 2.5%The Federalist: 0.8%Genetic Fallacy2.2%This article: 12.2%Skye Graham: 3.7%The Federalist: 3.1%Unattributed Quote12.2%This article: 7.9%Skye Graham: 2.0%The Federalist: 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection7.9%This article: 8.1%Skye Graham: 9.3%The Federalist: 19.9%Biased Writer Voice8.1%This article: 4.8%Skye Graham: 3.6%The Federalist: 5.4%Indoctrination4.8%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 0.7%The Federalist: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Skye Graham: 10.8%The Federalist: 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.5%Skye Graham: 0.3%The Federalist: 1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.5%

764 words analyzed.

Speakers

9speakers43%attributed speech435writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageMargaret Rennix • 32 words • 0.0% coverageMargaret Rennix • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageMargaret Rennix • 38 words • 100.0% coverageThe Atlantic • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDerek Thompson • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageThe New York Times • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageRachelle Peterson • 40 words • 100.0% coverageRachelle Peterson • 22 words • 100.0% coverageAatif Rashid • 53 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageEducation Week • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageNational Literacy Institute • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageTexas Board of Education • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

The Atlantic

100%flagged-word coverage
30 attributed words9.1% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+92.6 ptsWriter: 7.4%The Atlantic: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-8.5 ptsWriter: 8.5%The Atlantic: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -0.9 ptsWriter: 0.9%The Atlantic: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.