Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gwyneth Paltrow results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 855 hits. Analysis detected 6,257 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,391 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,792 of 37,536 keywords). This Gwyneth Paltrow is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Gwyneth Paltrow
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
34%Gwyneth Paltrow (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,391
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

34% percentile
025507510034.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 13.4%13.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate