Keyword summary
50% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,033 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Guillermo Del Toro results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 479 hits . Analysis detected 3,182 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,936 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (21,256 of 37,536 keywords). This Guillermo Del Toro is better (less manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group. Guillermo Del Toro
Keyword details
Total words: 3,936
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst