Keyword summary
72%4 analyzed articles/videos2,225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greenhouse Gas Emissions results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,580 hits. Analysis detected 13,315 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,918 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (19,804 of 35,692 keywords). This Greenhouse Gas Emissions is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
45%Greenhouse Gas Emissions (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510044.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate